Bidaki, R (On the Application of) v Najafabadi
The Recorder was entitled to refuse a stay of proceedings and an adjournment; England was the proper forum; the application for stay was made late; no unfairness or breach of Article 6 ECHR was established.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bidaki; Respondent: Najafabadi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Stay of Proceedings, Forum Non Conveniens, Adjournment, Fair Hearing, Article 6 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Bidaki
Applicant
Najafabadi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Recorder erred in refusing to stay the English divorce proceedings in favour of Iranian proceedings
- 2 Whether the Recorder erred in refusing to adjourn the hearing on 30 November 2012
- 3 Whether the proceedings were unfair in terms of Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder was entitled to refuse a stay of proceedings and an adjournment; England was the proper forum; the application for stay was made late; no unfairness or breach of Article 6 ECHR was established.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused in all respects.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment