Winwood & Anor (Trustees of the E.E.Marsh Land Settlement) v Biffa Waste Services Ltdo & Anor [2010] EWHC 242 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

Winwood & Anor (Trustees of the E.E.Marsh Land Settlement) v Biffa Waste Services Ltdo & Anor [2010] EWHC 242 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

Clause 8(6)(d) of the Lease is not capable of imposing a broad, continuing duty on Biffa to apply for planning permissions and site licences to enable landfill activities to continue for as long as possible. The clause imposes only a limited obligation related to obtaining permissions to fill to the highest...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] EWHC 242 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Michael Ralph Winwood and Hugh Bampfield Carslake as trustees of the E. E. Marsh Land Settlement; Claimant: The Marsh Trust Limited; Defendant: Biffa Waste Services Limited; Defendant: Biffa Holdings Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Preliminary Issues / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Preliminary issues answered in favour of Defendants; declaration that clause 8(6)(d) does not impose the broad duty contended for by Claimants.
Legal Topics
Contractual Interpretation, Lease Obligations, Waste Disposal Regulation, Planning Permission, Site Licensing
Contract Law Landlord and Tenant Environmental Law Contractual Interpretation Lease Obligations Waste Disposal Regulation Planning Permission Site Licensing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Ralph Winwood and Hugh Bampfield Carslake as trustees of the E. E. Marsh Land Settlement

Claimant

The Marsh Trust Limited

Claimant

Biffa Waste Services Limited

Defendant

Biffa Holdings Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Preliminary Issues / Judgment on Preliminary Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether clause 8(6)(d) of the Lease imposes a broad, continuing duty on Biffa to apply for planning permissions and site licences to enable landfill activities to continue for as long as possible
  2. 2 Whether clause 8(6)(d) obliges Biffa to take specific actions listed in the preliminary issues (17(a)-(d))

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 8(6)(d) of the Lease is not capable of imposing a broad, continuing duty on Biffa to apply for planning permissions and site licences to enable landfill activities to continue for as long as possible. The clause imposes only a limited obligation related to obtaining permissions to fill to the highest practicable contours, not an ongoing obligation to keep the site open for waste disposal.

Court Disposition

Preliminary issues answered in favour of Defendants; declaration that clause 8(6)(d) does not impose the broad duty contended for by Claimants.

Orders

  • Declaration that clause 8(6)(d) of the Lease does not oblige Biffa to carry out the actions specified in preliminary issues 17(a)-(d).