K, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council
A local authority is not, as a matter of law, bound to accept an immigration judge’s finding as to age for the purposes of its statutory duties under the Children Act 1989. The authority must undertake its own assessment, taking into account the tribunal’s reasoning and any new evidence, but is not required to adopt...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: K; Defendant: Birmingham City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Preliminary Issue Determination on Binding Effect of Immigration Judge's Age Finding; Permission to Proceed to Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission granted to proceed to substantive hearing on the lawfulness of the defendant’s age assessment; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Age Assessment, Res Judicata, Judicial Review, Children Act 1989, Evidential Weight of Tribunal Findings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K
Claimant
Birmingham City Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Preliminary Issue Determination on Binding Effect of Immigration Judge's Age Finding; Permission to Proceed to Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a local authority bound by an immigration judge's finding of fact as to age in subsequent age assessment under the Children Act 1989?
- 2 Does the principle of res judicata or issue estoppel apply to such findings?
- 3 What is the correct approach for a local authority when an immigration tribunal has made a finding on age?
Ratio Decidendi
A local authority is not, as a matter of law, bound to accept an immigration judge’s finding as to age for the purposes of its statutory duties under the Children Act 1989. The authority must undertake its own assessment, taking into account the tribunal’s reasoning and any new evidence, but is not required to adopt or follow the tribunal’s finding. The principles of res judicata and issue estoppel do not apply in these circumstances, especially where the parties and evidence differ and the authority was not heard before the tribunal.
Court Disposition
Permission granted to proceed to substantive hearing on the lawfulness of the defendant’s age assessment; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Interim orders to continue recognising the claimant as a child and entitled to s.17 and s.20 Children Act entitlements, subject to 48 hours’ notice if circumstances change.
- Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment