Cardin, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Crown Court & Anor

Cardin, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Crown Court & Anor

Failure to serve written notice of appeal within statutory time limit does not deprive Crown Court of jurisdiction if prosecution acted with due diligence and circumstances were outside its control; administrative error in warrant did not render detention unlawful; no duty on Magistrates’ Court to release claimant absent clear evidence of non-compliance.

Parties
Claimant: Tyrone Cardin; Defendant: Birmingham Crown Court; Defendant: Birmingham Magistrates’ Court; Interested Party: The Crown Prosecution Service; Interested Party: The Governor of HMP Winson Green
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission and Substantive Hearing (rolled Up)
Outcome
Permission refused; claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Bail, Judicial Review, Jurisdiction, Procedural Compliance
Criminal Law Administrative Law Bail Judicial Review Jurisdiction Procedural Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tyrone Cardin

Claimant

Birmingham Crown Court

Defendant

Birmingham Magistrates’ Court

Defendant

The Crown Prosecution Service

Interested Party

The Governor of HMP Winson Green

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Permission and Substantive Hearing (rolled Up)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether failure to serve written notice of appeal within statutory time limit deprives Crown Court of jurisdiction to hear prosecution appeal against grant of bail
  2. 2 Whether administrative error in warrant affects lawfulness of detention
  3. 3 Whether Magistrates’ Court had duty to release claimant when notice not served

Ratio Decidendi

Failure to serve written notice of appeal within statutory time limit does not deprive Crown Court of jurisdiction if prosecution acted with due diligence and circumstances were outside its control; administrative error in warrant did not render detention unlawful; no duty on Magistrates’ Court to release claimant absent clear evidence of non-compliance.

Court Disposition

Permission refused; claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Permission for judicial review refused.
  • No order for release; claimant lawfully detained.