Mills, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Magistrates Court
The facts of the theft did not amount to behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress within the meaning of section 1C of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. The Anti-Social Behaviour Order was therefore ultra vires and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Claire Louise Mills; Defendant: Birmingham Magistrates Court; Interested Party: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown Prosecution Service)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review allowed; Anti-Social Behaviour Order quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Social Behaviour Orders, Judicial Review, Proportionality, Ultra Vires, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claire Louise Mills
Claimant
Birmingham Magistrates Court
Defendant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown Prosecution Service)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the circumstances of the theft constituted anti-social behaviour under section 1C of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998
- 2 Whether the Anti-Social Behaviour Order was ultra vires and/or perverse
- 3 Whether the order was disproportionate in scope
Ratio Decidendi
The facts of the theft did not amount to behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress within the meaning of section 1C of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. The Anti-Social Behaviour Order was therefore ultra vires and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review allowed; Anti-Social Behaviour Order quashed.
Orders
- Anti-Social Behaviour Order quashed.
- Claimant awarded costs against the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown Prosecution Service), subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment