Birmingham Mail v ED [2011] EWCA Civ 1759 (07 December 2011)
The publication by the Birmingham Mail did not breach the terms of the 10 February 2011 order, as the order permitted publication of information from public court proceedings and did not specifically restrict identification of the defendants. The finding of contempt and the associated costs order were therefore set...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 1759
- Parties
- Appellant: Birmingham Mail; Respondent: ED
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Reporting Restrictions, Contempt of Court, Costs Orders, Publication of Criminal Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Birmingham Mail
Appellant
ED
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the publication by the Birmingham Mail breached the terms of the reporting restriction order of 10 February 2011
- 2 Whether the finding of contempt and the associated costs order against the Birmingham Mail were justified
Ratio Decidendi
The publication by the Birmingham Mail did not breach the terms of the 10 February 2011 order, as the order permitted publication of information from public court proceedings and did not specifically restrict identification of the defendants. The finding of contempt and the associated costs order were therefore set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Finding of contempt set aside
- Costs order against Birmingham Mail set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment