Co-Operative Group Ltd v Birse Developments Ltd & Ors
Permission to amend is granted in principle to allow the claimant to plead that already pleaded defects (such as thickness and joint issues) led to the decision or need to replace the slabs, provided adequate particulars are supplied. The amendments do not constitute a new cause of action precluded by the Court of Appeal's judgment, as they arise from the same facts and matters already in issue. Alternative claims for partial repair costs are also permissible, subject to the reasonableness and factual findings at trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Co-Operative Group Limited; Defendant: Birse Developments Limited; Third Party: Stuarts Industrial Flooring Limited; Fourth Party: Jubb & Partners (a firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction Dispute) / Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Permission to amend granted (subject to conditions)
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Damages for Breach of Contract, Causation, Measure of Damages, Concurrent Causes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Co-Operative Group Limited
Claimant
Birse Developments Limited
Defendant
Stuarts Industrial Flooring Limited
Third Party
Jubb & Partners (a firm)
Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction Dispute) / Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be granted permission to amend its pleadings to claim the cost of total replacement of warehouse floor slabs based on already pleaded defects (excluding steel fibre content)
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments constitute a new cause of action precluded by the Court of Appeal's earlier judgment
- 3 Whether the claimant can plead alternative claims for partial repair costs if total replacement is not recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend is granted in principle to allow the claimant to plead that already pleaded defects (such as thickness and joint issues) led to the decision or need to replace the slabs, provided adequate particulars are supplied. The amendments do not constitute a new cause of action precluded by the Court of Appeal's judgment, as they arise from the same facts and matters already in issue. Alternative claims for partial repair costs are also permissible, subject to the reasonableness and factual findings at trial.
Court Disposition
Permission to amend granted (subject to conditions)
Orders
- Claimant to provide adequate particulars of the decision to replace the slabs, including how, why, when, in what terms, on what basis, and by whom the decision was taken.
- Claimant to clarify and particularise the relevance of the 70KN loading requirement to the pleaded defects.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment