BL, R v
The evidence of the complainant's mother regarding a prior complaint was properly admitted to rebut the inference of recent fabrication, and the jury was adequately directed as to its limited use. The original sentence was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age and health, warranting reduction.
- Parties
- Appellant: BL; Respondent: THE QUEEN
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Indecent Assault, Indecency With a Child, Evidence of Complaint, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BL
Appellant
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence of a prior complaint was properly admitted to rebut alleged recent fabrication
- 2 Whether the jury was properly directed on the limited use of the complaint evidence
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age and health
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of the complainant's mother regarding a prior complaint was properly admitted to rebut the inference of recent fabrication, and the jury was adequately directed as to its limited use. The original sentence was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age and health, warranting reduction.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
Orders
- Sentence of 5 years imprisonment quashed.
- On Counts 1, 3, and 5, sentence of 2½ years imprisonment substituted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment