A E Yates Trenchless Solutions Ltd v Black & Veatch Ltd
The sub-contract was formed by the documents sent with the Defendant’s letter of 3 November 2005, including the Brown Book conditions, SWW amendments, and Yates’ quotation, with the Brown Book conditions taking precedence in the event of conflict. Yates’ conduct objectively indicated acceptance of these terms.
- Parties
- Claimant: A E Yates Trenchless Solutions Limited; Defendant: Black and Veatch Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Defendant on preliminary issues
- Legal Topics
- Contract Formation, Battle of the Forms, Priority of Contractual Documents, Sub Contract Incorporation, Liquidated Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A E Yates Trenchless Solutions Limited
Claimant
Black and Veatch Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 What documents constituted the sub-contract between the parties?
- 2 Which terms and conditions have contractual priority in the event of conflict?
- 3 Was the Claimant's quotation incorporated with precedence over the Brown Book conditions?
Ratio Decidendi
The sub-contract was formed by the documents sent with the Defendant’s letter of 3 November 2005, including the Brown Book conditions, SWW amendments, and Yates’ quotation, with the Brown Book conditions taking precedence in the event of conflict. Yates’ conduct objectively indicated acceptance of these terms.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Defendant on preliminary issues
Orders
- Declarations that the documents enclosed with the Defendant’s letter of 3 November 2005 were incorporated in and formed the Sub-Contract between the parties
- Declarations that the terms and conditions of the I Chem E Form of Contract for Civil Engineering Works 'The Brown Book' Second Edition 2004 take precedence over the terms and conditions of the Claimant’s quotation dated 20 October 2005 where the two conflict
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment