Blench v DPP

Blench v DPP

The police officers were lawfully on the premises under section 17(1)(e) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 due to a credible emergency call regarding a child at risk. The appellant's aggressive conduct and obstruction constituted a breach of the peace and justified his arrest. The officers acted within the execution of their duty at all material times, and the requirements of section 28(3) were satisfied as far as practicable. The conviction for assaulting a police constable in the execution of his duty was therefore upheld.

Parties
Appellant: Blench; Respondent: DPP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 November 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Assaulting a Police Officer, Breach of the Peace, Police Entry and Arrest Powers, Section 17 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Blench

Appellant

DPP

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether there was evidence to support the conviction for assaulting a police constable in the execution of his duty
  2. 2 Whether the police officers were lawfully on the premises under section 17(1)(e) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  3. 3 Whether the appellant had the right to deny police entry

Ratio Decidendi

The police officers were lawfully on the premises under section 17(1)(e) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 due to a credible emergency call regarding a child at risk. The appellant's aggressive conduct and obstruction constituted a breach of the peace and justified his arrest. The officers acted within the execution of their duty at all material times, and the requirements of section 28(3) were satisfied as far as practicable. The conviction for assaulting a police constable in the execution of his duty was therefore upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed