BLV, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 257 (13 March 2025)

BLV, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 257 (13 March 2025)

The convictions on counts 3, 4, and 6 are unsafe because the jury was not properly directed to consider the ambiguity in the evidence regarding the complainant's age, a necessary element of the offences. The error was specific to those counts and did not affect the safety of the remaining convictions.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 257
Parties
Appellant: BLV; Respondent: REX
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; convictions on counts 3, 4, and 6 quashed; remaining convictions undisturbed; sentence reduced.
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Appeals, Unsafe Convictions, Directions to Jury, Retrial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BLV

Appellant

REX

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether convictions on counts 3, 4, and 6 were unsafe due to insufficient evidence of complainant's age under 13 at the time of the offences
  2. 2 Whether unsafe convictions on some counts tainted the safety of convictions on other counts

Ratio Decidendi

The convictions on counts 3, 4, and 6 are unsafe because the jury was not properly directed to consider the ambiguity in the evidence regarding the complainant's age, a necessary element of the offences. The error was specific to those counts and did not affect the safety of the remaining convictions.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; convictions on counts 3, 4, and 6 quashed; remaining convictions undisturbed; sentence reduced.

Orders

  • Extension of time to appeal granted
  • Leave to appeal on ground 1 granted