Jacenciuk, R v

Jacenciuk, R v

The sentence of three and a half years was manifestly excessive given the appellant's guilty plea, low risk of re-offending, lack of premeditation, and psychiatric findings; a two-year sentence was appropriate.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Bogdan Janceniuk
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Arson, Sentencing, Guilty Plea Credit, Psychiatric Assessment
Criminal Law Arson Sentencing Guilty Plea Credit Psychiatric Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Bogdan Janceniuk

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether sufficient credit was given for the guilty plea

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of three and a half years was manifestly excessive given the appellant's guilty plea, low risk of re-offending, lack of premeditation, and psychiatric findings; a two-year sentence was appropriate.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • sentence of three and a half years quashed
  • substituted sentence of two years imprisonment