Air Transworld Ltd v Bombardier Inc [2012] EWHC 243 (Comm) (20 February 2012)
Article 4 of the APA, by necessary inference and sufficiently clear language, excludes the implied conditions of the Sale of Goods Act 1979. The APA and Assignment Agreement constitute international supply contracts under UCTA, so statutory controls on exclusion clauses do not apply. The claimant's right to reject and claim a refund is governed solely by the contractual warranty, not by statutory implied terms.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 243 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Air Transworld Limited; Defendant: Bombardier Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Exclusion Clauses, Sale of Goods, International Supply Contracts, Interpretation of Contract Terms, Unfair Contract Terms Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Air Transworld Limited
Claimant
Bombardier Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 4 of the Aircraft Purchase Agreement validly excludes implied conditions under the Sale of Goods Act 1979
- 2 Whether the APA and Assignment Agreement constitute 'International Supply Contracts' under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
- 3 Whether the claimant validly rejected the aircraft and is entitled to a refund or damages
Ratio Decidendi
Article 4 of the APA, by necessary inference and sufficiently clear language, excludes the implied conditions of the Sale of Goods Act 1979. The APA and Assignment Agreement constitute international supply contracts under UCTA, so statutory controls on exclusion clauses do not apply. The claimant's right to reject and claim a refund is governed solely by the contractual warranty, not by statutory implied terms.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The claimant's claim for a declaration of valid rejection and refund is dismissed.
- The claimant is not entitled to damages under the Sale of Goods Act 1979.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment