Tociapski v Tociapski [2013] EWHC 1770 (Ch) (20 March 2013)
The 2009 will is invalid because the deceased did not know and approve its contents, given his impaired capacity and total dependence on the Defendant; the transfer of Hillcrest Cottage is set aside for undue influence as the circumstances and relationship called for explanation, which was not satisfactorily provided.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 1770 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Paul Tociapski; Defendant: Boris Tociapski
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/chancery / Final Judgment After Trial; Defendant Absent
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; 2009 will set aside; transfer set aside for undue influence.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Undue Influence, Testamentary Capacity, Non Est Factum, Setting Aside Inter Vivos Transfer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Tociapski
Claimant
Boris Tociapski
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/chancery / Final Judgment After Trial; Defendant Absent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2009 will is valid and represents the deceased's testamentary intentions
- 2 Whether the deceased knew and approved the contents of the 2009 will
- 3 Whether the 2009 will was procured by undue influence
Ratio Decidendi
The 2009 will is invalid because the deceased did not know and approve its contents, given his impaired capacity and total dependence on the Defendant; the transfer of Hillcrest Cottage is set aside for undue influence as the circumstances and relationship called for explanation, which was not satisfactorily provided.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; 2009 will set aside; transfer set aside for undue influence.
Orders
- Declaration that the 2009 will is invalid and set aside
- Revocation of grant of probate dated 27 May 2010
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment