Hatton & Anor v Connew & Anor
Defendants are entitled to a re-trial regarding Bank Strip and Triangle and 70% of appeal costs; claimants are entitled to 30% of appeal costs for Swathe. Costs below must be varied, with costs relating to Bank Strip and Triangle reserved for re-trial judge. Payment on account for Swathe costs set at £7,500, offset against appeal costs, resulting in claimants owing defendants £965.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: William Patrick Hatton; Claimant/respondent: Margaret Mary Hatton; Defendant/appellant: Peter Connew; Defendant/appellant: Iris Connew
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs and Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part (Bank Strip and Triangle), dismissed in part (Swathe); costs orders varied.
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Disputes, Costs Assessment, Case Management, Appeal Disposition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Patrick Hatton
Claimant/respondent
Margaret Mary Hatton
Claimant/respondent
Peter Connew
Defendant/appellant
Iris Connew
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs and Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 disposition of appeal regarding Bank Strip, Triangle, and Swathe
- 2 case management directions
- 3 assessment and apportionment of appeal costs
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants are entitled to a re-trial regarding Bank Strip and Triangle and 70% of appeal costs; claimants are entitled to 30% of appeal costs for Swathe. Costs below must be varied, with costs relating to Bank Strip and Triangle reserved for re-trial judge. Payment on account for Swathe costs set at £7,500, offset against appeal costs, resulting in claimants owing defendants £965.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part (Bank Strip and Triangle), dismissed in part (Swathe); costs orders varied.
Orders
- Claim in respect of Bank Strip and Triangle remitted for re-hearing before different judge.
- Claimants to pay defendants £8,465 in respect of appeal costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment