Bowker v R.
The sentence imposed should reflect the appellant's age at the time of the offence, but deterrence and the appellant's leading role justify a substantial sentence; a reduction from 28 to 24 months is appropriate. Article 7.1 ECHR is not breached as there was no retroactive change in law. The anti-social behaviour order is not inappropriate in scope or duration given the facts.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bowker; Respondent: R
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing of Young Offenders, Age at Time of Offence Vs Conviction, Anti Social Behaviour Orders, Deterrent Sentencing, Article 7 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bowker
Appellant
R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant, who was under 18 at the time of the offence but over 18 at conviction, was excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the anti-social behaviour order was too wide or indefinite
- 3 Whether Article 7.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights precludes a heavier penalty due to age at conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed should reflect the appellant's age at the time of the offence, but deterrence and the appellant's leading role justify a substantial sentence; a reduction from 28 to 24 months is appropriate. Article 7.1 ECHR is not breached as there was no retroactive change in law. The anti-social behaviour order is not inappropriate in scope or duration given the facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Period of detention reduced from 28 months to 24 months
- Anti-social behaviour order upheld as imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment