Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Green & Anor

Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Green & Anor

The Recorder did not err in law or principle; he considered all relevant factors, including the offer of suitable accommodation, and was entitled to conclude that the tenant's personal circumstances outweighed the public interest factors. The appeal court should not interfere with this evaluative judgment.

Parties
Appellant: Bracknell Forest Borough Council; First Respondent: Harry Melvin Green; Second Respondent: Denise Ann Green
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Possession Proceedings, Secure Tenancy, Under Occupation, Reasonableness of Possession Order, Suitable Alternative Accommodation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bracknell Forest Borough Council

Appellant

Harry Melvin Green

First Respondent

Denise Ann Green

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Recorder gave insufficient weight to the factors favouring possession, including public housing needs and under-occupation
  2. 2 Whether the Recorder misdirected himself by excluding the availability of suitable accommodation from the reasonableness assessment

Ratio Decidendi

The Recorder did not err in law or principle; he considered all relevant factors, including the offer of suitable accommodation, and was entitled to conclude that the tenant's personal circumstances outweighed the public interest factors. The appeal court should not interfere with this evaluative judgment.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Council to pay first respondent's costs of the appeal, subject to detailed assessment
  • Detailed assessment of first respondent's publicly funded costs