Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Green & Anor
The Recorder did not err in law or principle; he considered all relevant factors, including the offer of suitable accommodation, and was entitled to conclude that the tenant's personal circumstances outweighed the public interest factors. The appeal court should not interfere with this evaluative judgment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bracknell Forest Borough Council; First Respondent: Harry Melvin Green; Second Respondent: Denise Ann Green
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Possession Proceedings, Secure Tenancy, Under Occupation, Reasonableness of Possession Order, Suitable Alternative Accommodation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bracknell Forest Borough Council
Appellant
Harry Melvin Green
First Respondent
Denise Ann Green
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Recorder gave insufficient weight to the factors favouring possession, including public housing needs and under-occupation
- 2 Whether the Recorder misdirected himself by excluding the availability of suitable accommodation from the reasonableness assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder did not err in law or principle; he considered all relevant factors, including the offer of suitable accommodation, and was entitled to conclude that the tenant's personal circumstances outweighed the public interest factors. The appeal court should not interfere with this evaluative judgment.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Council to pay first respondent's costs of the appeal, subject to detailed assessment
- Detailed assessment of first respondent's publicly funded costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment