Allen, R. v

Allen, R. v

Once it is shown that the offence is within schedule 1 of the Act and the court is satisfied as to the statutory test, the court has no discretion and must impose a Football Banning Order.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Bradley Allen; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Football Banning Order
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Football Banning Order, Affray, Football Spectators Act 1989, Sentencing
Criminal Law Football Banning Order Affray Football Spectators Act 1989 Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bradley Allen

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Football Banning Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Football Banning Order was properly imposed under section 14A of the Football Spectators Act 1989

Ratio Decidendi

Once it is shown that the offence is within schedule 1 of the Act and the court is satisfied as to the statutory test, the court has no discretion and must impose a Football Banning Order.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Football Banning Order upheld