Barnes v Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors [2012] EW Misc 6 (CCrimC) (04 April 2012)

Barnes v Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors [2012] EW Misc 6 (CCrimC) (04 April 2012)

It would breach Article 1 First Protocol ECHR for companies to bear ultimate burden of receiver's costs where their assets were wrongly made subject to receivership; POCA must be interpreted under section 3 Human Rights Act 1998 to permit court to order CPS to pay receiver's remuneration and expenses in such circumstances.

Citation
[2012] EW Misc 6 (CCrimC)
Parties
Applicant: Brandon Barnes; Respondent/applicant: Eastenders Cash & Carry PLC & Others; Respondent/interested Party: Crown Prosecution Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 April 2012
Procedural Posture
Application for Receivership Remuneration and Compensation Under POCA / Post Discharge Hearing Following Court of Appeal Quashing Receivership Order
Outcome
Court orders CPS to pay receiver's remuneration and expenses; companies relieved of ultimate liability.
Legal Topics
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Receivership, Article 1 First Protocol ECHR, Compensation, Lien, Remuneration of Receiver

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brandon Barnes

Applicant

Eastenders Cash & Carry PLC & Others

Respondent/applicant

Crown Prosecution Service

Respondent/interested Party

Procedural Posture

Application for Receivership Remuneration and Compensation Under POCA / Post Discharge Hearing Following Court of Appeal Quashing Receivership Order

  1. 1 Is the receiver entitled to remuneration and expenses from assets wrongly made subject to a receivership order?
  2. 2 Do companies bear the ultimate burden for receiver's costs when their assets were not realisable property?
  3. 3 Does Article 1 of the First Protocol to the ECHR require compensation or indemnity for companies?

Ratio Decidendi

It would breach Article 1 First Protocol ECHR for companies to bear ultimate burden of receiver's costs where their assets were wrongly made subject to receivership; POCA must be interpreted under section 3 Human Rights Act 1998 to permit court to order CPS to pay receiver's remuneration and expenses in such circumstances.

Court Disposition

Court orders CPS to pay receiver's remuneration and expenses; companies relieved of ultimate liability.

Orders

  • Receiver's remuneration and expenses to be paid by CPS, not companies.
  • Companies not liable for receiver's costs incurred during receivership period.