Smith, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1610 (21 November 2025)
The original sentence failed to sufficiently reflect the totality and seriousness of the offending, particularly by not providing adequate uplift for the multiple sexual offences committed. The appropriate sentence, after trial, for the lead offence reflecting all criminality was 17 years' custody with a 3-year extended licence period.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1610
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Respondent: Brandon Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 / Appeal Against Sentence (unduly Lenient Sentence Reference)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Brandon Smith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 / Appeal Against Sentence (unduly Lenient Sentence Reference)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for multiple sexual offences including rape was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under sentencing guidelines
- 3 Appropriate uplift for multiple offences in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence failed to sufficiently reflect the totality and seriousness of the offending, particularly by not providing adequate uplift for the multiple sexual offences committed. The appropriate sentence, after trial, for the lead offence reflecting all criminality was 17 years' custody with a 3-year extended licence period.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Custodial term for count 1 (rape) increased to 17 years' imprisonment
- Extended licence period of 3 years maintained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment