Preece v Edwards

Preece v Edwards

The judge's conclusion that the documents were forgeries and that Mr Edwards was only employed to draw plans could not stand due to inadequate reasoning, failure to address uncontradicted expert evidence, and improper reliance on adverse inferences not put to the claimant. The order dismissing the claim was set aside and a retrial ordered.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Stephen James Preece; Defendant/respondent: Dafydd Wyn Edwards
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dismissing Claim
Outcome
Appeal allowed; order dismissing claim set aside; retrial ordered.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Forgery, Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof, Standard of Proof, Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen James Preece

Claimant/appellant

Dafydd Wyn Edwards

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dismissing Claim

  1. 1 Whether the documents relied upon by the claimant were genuine or forged
  2. 2 Whether the judge's reasoning and findings on authenticity and credibility were adequate
  3. 3 Whether adverse inferences against the claimant were properly drawn

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's conclusion that the documents were forgeries and that Mr Edwards was only employed to draw plans could not stand due to inadequate reasoning, failure to address uncontradicted expert evidence, and improper reliance on adverse inferences not put to the claimant. The order dismissing the claim was set aside and a retrial ordered.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; order dismissing claim set aside; retrial ordered.

Orders

  • Fresh trial of liability only ordered at Birmingham County Court
  • Case removed from Technology and Construction Court list