USK Valley Conservation Group, R (on the application of) v Brecon Beacons National Park Authority
The claimant is entitled to its costs from the National Park Authority up to one month after the acknowledgement of service regarding the 2005 planning permission, reflecting the Authority's concession. Thereafter, the Authority is not liable for further costs on that issue. The interested parties must pay fifteen percent of the remaining claimant's costs and one-and-a-half days of hearing costs for the 2005 issue, reflecting their limited but relevant involvement. For the 2008 decision, the claimant must pay eighty percent of the Authority's costs, as its success was on a narrow point and it lost on the main issues. Leave to appeal the costs orders was refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Usk Valley Conservation Group; Defendant: Brecon Beacons National Park Authority; Interested Party: Interested Parties
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Costs Ruling After Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs apportioned as specified; leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Planning Permission, Public Interest Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Usk Valley Conservation Group
Claimant
Brecon Beacons National Park Authority
Defendant
Interested Parties
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Costs Ruling After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs following partial success in judicial review of planning permission
- 2 Allocation of costs between claimant, defendant, and interested parties
- 3 Impact of public interest and conduct on costs orders
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to its costs from the National Park Authority up to one month after the acknowledgement of service regarding the 2005 planning permission, reflecting the Authority's concession. Thereafter, the Authority is not liable for further costs on that issue. The interested parties must pay fifteen percent of the remaining claimant's costs and one-and-a-half days of hearing costs for the 2005 issue, reflecting their limited but relevant involvement. For the 2008 decision, the claimant must pay eighty percent of the Authority's costs, as its success was on a narrow point and it lost on the main issues. Leave to appeal the costs orders was refused.
Court Disposition
Costs apportioned as specified; leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- National Park Authority to pay claimant's costs up to one month after acknowledgement of service for 2005 issue.
- Claimant to pay eighty percent of National Park Authority's costs for 2008 issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment