Breyer Group Plc v RBK Engineering Ltd [2017] EWHC 1206 (Ch) (19 May 2017)
The petition debt is disputed on bona fide and substantial grounds and there are significant potential cross-claims. Breyer is not unable to pay its debts. The continuation of the winding up petition would be oppressive and an abuse of process. The petition is struck out.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1206 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: Breyer Group PLC; Respondent: RBK Engineering Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency / Winding Up Petition / Application to Strike Out Creditor's Winding Up Petition
- Outcome
- Petition struck out
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up Petitions, Abuse of Process, Substantial Dispute, Cross Claims, Construction Contracts, Payment Notices, Adjudication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Breyer Group PLC
Applicant
RBK Engineering Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency / Winding Up Petition / Application to Strike Out Creditor's Winding Up Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is unable to pay its debts within the meaning of insolvency law
- 2 Whether the debt claimed by the respondent is genuinely disputed on substantial grounds
- 3 Whether there are substantial cross-claims by the applicant against the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The petition debt is disputed on bona fide and substantial grounds and there are significant potential cross-claims. Breyer is not unable to pay its debts. The continuation of the winding up petition would be oppressive and an abuse of process. The petition is struck out.
Court Disposition
Petition struck out
Orders
- The winding up petition is struck out as an abuse of process.
- RBK is restrained from proceeding further with the creditor's petition to wind up Breyer, whether by advertising or otherwise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment