Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs v Stork [2005] EWHC 1763 (QB) (03 August 2005)
The correct interpretation of the Graduated Fees Scheme is that the 'length of trial uplift' is payable only for the number of days the trial against the individual assisted person lasted, not for the entire duration of the trial involving co-defendants. The statutory definitions and formulae require a consistent approach, and the scheme is a stand-alone system distinct from the historic regime.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 1763
- Parties
- Claimant: The Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs; Defendant: Brian Stork
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Graduated Fees Scheme, Remuneration of Barristers, Statutory Interpretation, Legal Aid Funding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs
Claimant
Brian Stork
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a barrister is entitled to the daily 'length of trial uplift' for the entire duration of a multi-defendant trial or only for the days attended on behalf of an acquitted client under the Graduated Fees Scheme.
Ratio Decidendi
The correct interpretation of the Graduated Fees Scheme is that the 'length of trial uplift' is payable only for the number of days the trial against the individual assisted person lasted, not for the entire duration of the trial involving co-defendants. The statutory definitions and formulae require a consistent approach, and the scheme is a stand-alone system distinct from the historic regime.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; the barrister is entitled to the 'length of trial uplift' only for the days the trial against his client lasted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment