Wade & Anor v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge was entitled to find, on the evidence, that Sky's show was independently created and did not use the claimants' confidential information, consciously or subconsciously. The judge's approach to the combination of features, the burden of proof, and the weighing of evidence was correct and disclosed no error of law or principle.
- Parties
- Appellant: Brian Wade; Appellant: Geraldine Perry; Respondent: British Sky Broadcasting Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Misuse of Confidential Information, Breach of Confidence, Independent Creation, Burden of Proof, Evidential Inference, Copyright Analogy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Wade
Appellant
Geraldine Perry
Appellant
British Sky Broadcasting Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sky misused confidential information provided by the claimants in developing 'Must Be The Music'
- 2 Whether the combination of features in the claimants' format had the necessary quality of confidence
- 3 Whether Sky's show was independently created or copied, consciously or subconsciously, from the claimants' format
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge was entitled to find, on the evidence, that Sky's show was independently created and did not use the claimants' confidential information, consciously or subconsciously. The judge's approach to the combination of features, the burden of proof, and the weighing of evidence was correct and disclosed no error of law or principle.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment