Zeiderman v Zeiderman
The district judge's orders were based on assumptions and beliefs rather than evidence, particularly regarding the existence of concealed assets and the credibility of the parties. The refusal to admit fresh evidence on appeal was inappropriate given the centrality of the disputed property to the case. Justice required a rehearing before a different tribunal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Brian Zeiderman; Respondent: Lorna Zeiderman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Family/ancillary Relief / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; orders of district judge and Black J set aside; rehearing ordered
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Financial Provision on Divorce, Appeal Procedure, Admission of Fresh Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Zeiderman
Appellant
Lorna Zeiderman
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Family/ancillary Relief / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the district judge erred in making property and periodical payment orders based on assumptions and beliefs rather than evidence
- 2 Whether the refusal to admit fresh evidence on appeal was justified
- 3 Whether the approach to matrimonial misconduct was correct under the law
Ratio Decidendi
The district judge's orders were based on assumptions and beliefs rather than evidence, particularly regarding the existence of concealed assets and the credibility of the parties. The refusal to admit fresh evidence on appeal was inappropriate given the centrality of the disputed property to the case. Justice required a rehearing before a different tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; orders of district judge and Black J set aside; rehearing ordered
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment