HM Attorney General for England And Wales v British Broadcasting Corporation [2025] EWHC 1669 (KB) (02 July 2025)
MI5 and the Attorney General misled the High Court, special advocates, IPT, and Investigatory Powers Commissioner by deploying false evidence regarding NCND and CHIS status. The court cannot rely on MI5's internal and external investigations due to procedural deficiencies. Consideration of contempt proceedings is adjourned pending a further investigation under the auspices of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner. Guidance is issued on candour and evidence presentation in national security cases.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 1669 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: HM Attorney General for England and Wales; Defendant: British Broadcasting Corporation; Claimant: The King on the application of 'Beth'; Defendant: The Investigatory Powers Tribunal; Interested Party: The Security Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Proceedings (injunction and Judicial Review) / Post Hearing Judgment, Consideration of Contempt, Guidance Issued, Further Investigation Ordered
- Outcome
- Consideration of contempt proceedings adjourned; further investigation ordered; guidance issued; injunction varied to allow reporting of false evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Closed Material Procedure, Candour in Legal Proceedings, Neither Confirm Nor Deny (ncnd) Policy, Contempt of Court, Disclosure, Breach of Confidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Attorney General for England and Wales
Claimant
British Broadcasting Corporation
Defendant
The King on the application of 'Beth'
Claimant
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal
Defendant
The Security Service
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
High Court Proceedings (injunction and Judicial Review) / Post Hearing Judgment, Consideration of Contempt, Guidance Issued, Further Investigation Ordered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether MI5 and the Attorney General misled the court and special advocates by deploying false evidence regarding NCND and CHIS status
- 2 Whether further steps should be taken regarding contempt of court
- 3 Whether NCND can be maintained as to X's CHIS status
Ratio Decidendi
MI5 and the Attorney General misled the High Court, special advocates, IPT, and Investigatory Powers Commissioner by deploying false evidence regarding NCND and CHIS status. The court cannot rely on MI5's internal and external investigations due to procedural deficiencies. Consideration of contempt proceedings is adjourned pending a further investigation under the auspices of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner. Guidance is issued on candour and evidence presentation in national security cases.
Court Disposition
Consideration of contempt proceedings adjourned; further investigation ordered; guidance issued; injunction varied to allow reporting of false evidence.
Orders
- Further investigation to be conducted under the Investigatory Powers Commissioner.
- Consideration of contempt proceedings adjourned pending investigation outcome.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment