BBC v BBC Pension Trust Limited & Anor
The word 'interests' in Rule 19.2(3) is a deliberately broad and open-textured term that, in context, includes not only rights earned by past service but also the linkage of those rights to final salary and the ability of Active Members to accrue future service benefits under the scheme as it stands before amendment. Any amendment that affects these interests engages the protection of the proviso, requiring either actuarial certification, provision of substantially equivalent benefits, or approval by Active Members as a class.
- Parties
- Appellant: British Broadcasting Corporation; First Respondent: BBC Pension Trust Limited; Second Respondent (representative Beneficiary): Christina Burns
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Pension Scheme Rules, Power of Amendment in Pension Schemes, Protection of Members' Interests, Statutory Restrictions on Pension Amendments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
British Broadcasting Corporation
Appellant
BBC Pension Trust Limited
First Respondent
Christina Burns
Second Respondent (representative Beneficiary)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Meaning of 'interests' of Active Members in Rule 19.2(3) of the BBC Pension Scheme
- 2 Scope of protection for members under amendment powers
- 3 Whether 'interests' includes future accrual and linkage to final salary
Ratio Decidendi
The word 'interests' in Rule 19.2(3) is a deliberately broad and open-textured term that, in context, includes not only rights earned by past service but also the linkage of those rights to final salary and the ability of Active Members to accrue future service benefits under the scheme as it stands before amendment. Any amendment that affects these interests engages the protection of the proviso, requiring either actuarial certification, provision of substantially equivalent benefits, or approval by Active Members as a class.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The judge’s answers to the questions posed in the claim form are affirmed: (a) rights earned by past service are protected; (b) linkage of past service rights to final salary is protected (subject to Bradbury v BBC); (c) the ability to accrue future service benefits on the same terms is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment