Henry v British Broadcasting Corporation

Henry v British Broadcasting Corporation

The documentary and oral evidence established that Mrs Henry was aware of and complicit in the manipulation of hospital waiting list data and participated in a cover-up; the broadcast's defamatory imputations were substantially true, so the defence of justification succeeds.

Parties
Claimant: Marion Henry; Defendant: British Broadcasting Corporation
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Libel / Final Judgment
Outcome
Defence of justification succeeds; claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Justification Defence, Libel, Hospital Management, Waiting List Manipulation, Cover Up Allegations
Defamation Media Law Justification Defence Libel Hospital Management Waiting List Manipulation Cover Up Allegations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marion Henry

Claimant

British Broadcasting Corporation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the broadcast was substantially true in its defamatory imputations against Mrs Henry
  2. 2 Whether Mrs Henry was complicit in manipulation of hospital waiting lists
  3. 3 Whether Mrs Henry participated in a cover-up of waiting list fraud

Ratio Decidendi

The documentary and oral evidence established that Mrs Henry was aware of and complicit in the manipulation of hospital waiting list data and participated in a cover-up; the broadcast's defamatory imputations were substantially true, so the defence of justification succeeds.

Court Disposition

Defence of justification succeeds; claim dismissed.