Henry v British Broadcasting Corporation [2006] EWHC 386 (QB) (09 March 2006)
The BBC failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that Mrs Henry was complicit in or had knowledge of the systematic manipulation of waiting lists or participated in a cover-up. The evidence did not establish that Mrs Henry was guilty of the defamatory imputations conveyed by the broadcast. The defence of justification fails.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 386
- Parties
- Claimant: Marion Henry; Defendant: British Broadcasting Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Libel / Final Judgment on Justification
- Outcome
- Claim succeeds; defence of justification fails.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Justification, Qualified Privilege, Hospital Waiting List Manipulation, Institutional Corruption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marion Henry
Claimant
British Broadcasting Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel / Final Judgment on Justification
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the broadcast accused Mrs Henry of systematic falsification of hospital waiting lists and whether such imputations are substantially true
- 2 Whether Mrs Henry was complicit in manipulation and cover-up of waiting list data at Weston General Hospital
- 3 Whether patients suffered as a result of the alleged fraud
Ratio Decidendi
The BBC failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that Mrs Henry was complicit in or had knowledge of the systematic manipulation of waiting lists or participated in a cover-up. The evidence did not establish that Mrs Henry was guilty of the defamatory imputations conveyed by the broadcast. The defence of justification fails.
Court Disposition
Claim succeeds; defence of justification fails.
Orders
- BBC to pay damages to Mrs Henry
- BBC to publish an apology or correction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment