A v British Broadcasting Corporation
The court has an inherent common law power to make exceptions to open justice, including anonymity orders, where necessary in the interests of justice or to protect Convention rights. The section 11 order restricting publication of A’s identity was necessary to protect A’s Article 3 rights and to maintain the integrity of the judicial review proceedings. The procedure followed, including the opportunity for the BBC to seek recall of the order, was fair and compatible with Article 10 ECHR and the Human Rights Act 1998. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Respondent: A; Appellant: British Broadcasting Corporation; Intervener: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Inner House of the Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Open Justice, Anonymity Orders, Freedom of Expression, Article 10 ECHR, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Contempt of Court, Judicial Review, Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Respondent
British Broadcasting Corporation
Appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Inner House of the Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has a common law power to protect the anonymity of a party where Convention rights are engaged
- 2 Whether the court acted compatibly with the BBC’s Article 10 ECHR rights in making the anonymity order
- 3 Whether section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 required the BBC to be notified and given an opportunity to make representations before the order was made
Ratio Decidendi
The court has an inherent common law power to make exceptions to open justice, including anonymity orders, where necessary in the interests of justice or to protect Convention rights. The section 11 order restricting publication of A’s identity was necessary to protect A’s Article 3 rights and to maintain the integrity of the judicial review proceedings. The procedure followed, including the opportunity for the BBC to seek recall of the order, was fair and compatible with Article 10 ECHR and the Human Rights Act 1998. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The anonymity order prohibiting publication of A’s identity or identifying details remains in place.
- No one shall publish or reveal the name of the respondent or any information likely to lead to identification in connection with these proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment