Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2014] EWHC 3915 (Ch) (26 November 2014)
The court is satisfied, for the same reasons as in the Main Application, that it is appropriate to grant a blocking order against the ISPs in respect of the newly identified counterfeiting websites.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 3915 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Cartier International AG; Defendant: British Sky Broadcasting Limited; Defendant: British Telecommunications PLC; Defendant: EE Limited; Defendant: TalkTalk Telecom Limited; Defendant: Virgin Media Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Injunction Application / Supplementary Application for Website Blocking Order
- Outcome
- Supplementary website blocking order granted
- Legal Topics
- Website Blocking Orders, Trade Mark Infringement, Counterfeiting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cartier International AG
Claimant
British Sky Broadcasting Limited
Defendant
British Telecommunications PLC
Defendant
EE Limited
Defendant
TalkTalk Telecom Limited
Defendant
Virgin Media Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Injunction Application / Supplementary Application for Website Blocking Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant a supplementary website blocking order against ISPs in respect of newly identified counterfeiting websites
Ratio Decidendi
The court is satisfied, for the same reasons as in the Main Application, that it is appropriate to grant a blocking order against the ISPs in respect of the newly identified counterfeiting websites.
Court Disposition
Supplementary website blocking order granted
Orders
- ISPs to block access to pillarrecruitment.com and pasmoldsolutions.com in the same terms as the order made on the Main Application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment