British Technology Group Limited v. Boehringer Mannheim Corporation and Deputy Orthopaedics Inc [2000] EWHC Patents 148 (13th February, 2000)
There is a present controversy between the parties as to the scope and extent of BTG's liabilities under the licence agreement, justifying declaratory relief. The contract is governed by English law, including clause 3(4). England is the appropriate forum for the trial of these issues, and leave to serve out of the jurisdiction should not be set aside.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC Patents 148
- Parties
- Plaintiff: British Technology Group Limited (BTG); First Defendant: Boehringer; Second Defendant: DePuy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Application to Set Aside Leave to Serve Out of Jurisdiction and Application to Amend Summons
- Outcome
- Application to set aside leave to serve out of jurisdiction refused; application to amend summons to be heard.
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Licence Agreements, Forum Non Conveniens, Choice of Law, Service Out of Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
British Technology Group Limited (BTG)
Plaintiff
Boehringer
First Defendant
DePuy
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Application to Set Aside Leave to Serve Out of Jurisdiction and Application to Amend Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should grant declaratory relief regarding BTG's obligations under a licence agreement
- 2 Whether the proper law of the contract is English law for the relevant issues
- 3 Whether England is the appropriate forum for the dispute
Ratio Decidendi
There is a present controversy between the parties as to the scope and extent of BTG's liabilities under the licence agreement, justifying declaratory relief. The contract is governed by English law, including clause 3(4). England is the appropriate forum for the trial of these issues, and leave to serve out of the jurisdiction should not be set aside.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside leave to serve out of jurisdiction refused; application to amend summons to be heard.
Orders
- Leave to serve the originating summons out of the jurisdiction is not set aside.
- Plaintiff's application for leave to amend the summons to be heard.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment