Northumbrian Water Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc
Application allowed in respect of categories 4, 5, and 7 as the documents sought are core contract documents relevant to the tunnelling works and meet the tests under CPR 31.16(3)(c) and (d); application refused for categories 1, 2, 3, and 6 as the documents are either non-existent, peripheral, or do not meet the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Northumbrian Water Ltd.; Defendant: British Telecommunications PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Pre Action Disclosure / Ruling on Application
- Outcome
- Application partly allowed, partly refused.
- Legal Topics
- Pre Action Disclosure, Disclosure of Documents, CPR 31.16, Contractual Liability, Construction Disputes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Northumbrian Water Ltd.
Claimant
British Telecommunications PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Pre Action Disclosure / Ruling on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the documents sought by NWL meet the criteria for pre-action disclosure under CPR 31.16(3)(c) and (d)
- 2 Whether BT has provided all relevant documents in its possession
- 3 Whether it is desirable for certain documents to be disclosed prior to litigation
Ratio Decidendi
Application allowed in respect of categories 4, 5, and 7 as the documents sought are core contract documents relevant to the tunnelling works and meet the tests under CPR 31.16(3)(c) and (d); application refused for categories 1, 2, 3, and 6 as the documents are either non-existent, peripheral, or do not meet the criteria for pre-action disclosure.
Court Disposition
Application partly allowed, partly refused.
Orders
- BT to disclose documents relating to heading support design, health and safety plan, and contract documents for tunnelling works (categories 4, 5, and 7).
- BT to make enquiries within seven days and inform NWL whether site diaries exist for tunnelling works (category 6).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment