Young Turks Recordings Ltd & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Ors
Stream ripping sites and apps infringe copyright by enabling and authorising unlicensed copying, circumventing technological protection measures, and communicating works to the public; ISPs are service providers with actual knowledge, and a blocking order is necessary, effective, and proportionate to prevent ongoing infringement.
- Parties
- Claimant: Young Turks Recordings Limited; Claimant: XL Recordings Limited; Claimant: Warner Music UK Limited; Claimant: Warner Bros. Records, Inc.; Claimant: Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited; Claimant: Simco Limited; Claimant: Queens Lite, Inc; Claimant: Matador Records Limited; Claimant: Domino Recording Company Limited; Claimant: Capitol Records, a division of Universal Operations Limited; Defendant: British Telecommunications PLC; Defendant: EE Limited; Defendant: Plusnet PLC; Defendant: Sky UK Limited; Defendant: TalkTalk Telecom Limited; Defendant: Virgin Media Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; blocking order granted.
- Legal Topics
- Website Blocking Orders, Stream Ripping, Technological Protection Measures, Copyright Infringement, Communication to the Public, Joint Tortfeasorship, Authorisation of Infringement, Proportionality of Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Young Turks Recordings Limited
Claimant
XL Recordings Limited
Claimant
Warner Music UK Limited
Claimant
Warner Bros. Records, Inc.
Claimant
Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited
Claimant
Simco Limited
Claimant
Queens Lite, Inc
Claimant
Matador Records Limited
Claimant
Domino Recording Company Limited
Claimant
Capitol Records, a division of Universal Operations Limited
Claimant
British Telecommunications PLC
Defendant
EE Limited
Defendant
Plusnet PLC
Defendant
Sky UK Limited
Defendant
TalkTalk Telecom Limited
Defendant
Virgin Media Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether stream ripping sites and apps infringe copyright and circumvent technological protection measures
- 2 Whether ISPs are service providers/intermediaries liable to block access under section 97A Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
- 3 Whether the operators of stream ripping sites authorise, induce, or jointly participate in copyright infringement
Ratio Decidendi
Stream ripping sites and apps infringe copyright by enabling and authorising unlicensed copying, circumventing technological protection measures, and communicating works to the public; ISPs are service providers with actual knowledge, and a blocking order is necessary, effective, and proportionate to prevent ongoing infringement.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; blocking order granted.
Orders
- ISPs ordered to block access to specified stream ripping websites and apps.
- Permission granted to affected parties to apply to vary or discharge the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment