Broadhurst & Anor v Tan & Anor
Where a claimant makes a successful Part 36 offer in a section IIIA fixed costs case, they are entitled to costs assessed on the indemnity basis from the date the relevant period expired, not limited to fixed costs. Rule 36.14A does not modify rule 36.14(3), and the specific provisions of Part 36 prevail over the general fixed costs regime.
- Parties
- Appellant: Broadhurst; Appellant: Taylor; Respondent: Tan; Respondent: Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal in Broadhurst allowed; appeal in Smith dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Personal Injury, Part 36 Offers, Fixed Costs, Indemnity Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Broadhurst
Appellant
Taylor
Appellant
Tan
Respondent
Smith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claimant who makes a successful Part 36 offer in a fixed costs personal injury case is entitled to costs assessed on the indemnity basis or limited to fixed costs under section IIIA of Part 45.
Ratio Decidendi
Where a claimant makes a successful Part 36 offer in a section IIIA fixed costs case, they are entitled to costs assessed on the indemnity basis from the date the relevant period expired, not limited to fixed costs. Rule 36.14A does not modify rule 36.14(3), and the specific provisions of Part 36 prevail over the general fixed costs regime.
Court Disposition
Appeal in Broadhurst allowed; appeal in Smith dismissed.
Orders
- Broadhurst entitled to costs assessed on the indemnity basis from the date the relevant period expired.
- Smith not entitled to appeal; lower court decision stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment