Broadhurst & Anor v Tan & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 94 (23 February 2016)
A claimant who makes a successful Part 36 offer in a Section IIIA fixed costs case is entitled to indemnity costs from the date the relevant period expires, not limited to fixed costs, because rule 36.14A does not modify rule 36.14(3) and the rules must be interpreted accordingly.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 94
- Parties
- Appellant: Broadhurst; Appellant: Taylor; Respondent: Tan; Respondent: Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal in Broadhurst allowed; appeal in Smith dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Costs, Part 36 Offers, Indemnity Costs, Road Traffic Accident Protocol, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Broadhurst
Appellant
Taylor
Appellant
Tan
Respondent
Smith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claimant who makes a successful Part 36 offer in a Section IIIA fixed costs case is entitled to indemnity costs or limited to fixed costs after the relevant period expires.
Ratio Decidendi
A claimant who makes a successful Part 36 offer in a Section IIIA fixed costs case is entitled to indemnity costs from the date the relevant period expires, not limited to fixed costs, because rule 36.14A does not modify rule 36.14(3) and the rules must be interpreted accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal in Broadhurst allowed; appeal in Smith dismissed.
Orders
- Broadhurst: Appeal allowed; claimant entitled to indemnity costs after relevant period.
- Smith: Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment