Broadstreet Ltd v Mr A James Ms L Holman (Eastern : Section 20ZA) [2017] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UB_LDC_2017_0013 (11 September 2017)
The tribunal determined whether the landlord complied with statutory consultation requirements under Section 20ZA and whether dispensation should be granted to recover service charges from the tenants.
- Citation
- [2017] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UB_LDC_2017_0013
- Parties
- Applicant: Broadstreet Ltd; Respondent: Mr A James; Respondent: Ms L Holman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Section 20 ZA Application / Decision
- Outcome
- Application determined
- Legal Topics
- Service Charges, Section 20 ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Broadstreet Ltd
Applicant
Mr A James
Respondent
Ms L Holman
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 20 ZA Application / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether landlord complied with Section 20 consultation requirements
- 2 Whether landlord can recover service charges from tenants
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal determined whether the landlord complied with statutory consultation requirements under Section 20ZA and whether dispensation should be granted to recover service charges from the tenants.
Court Disposition
Application determined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment