Harrington, R (on the application of) v Bromley Magistrates Court
The original magistrates' bench was entitled to retain jurisdiction and give the indication it did, and the claimant had a legitimate expectation that should be upheld. The district judge's decision to commit for sentence to the Crown Court was therefore quashed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Harrington; Defendant: Bromley Magistrates Court
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for judicial review allowed; district judge's decision to commit for sentence to the Crown Court quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Legitimate Expectation, Committal for Sentence, Sentencing Powers, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrington
Claimant
Bromley Magistrates Court
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the district judge's decision to commit the claimant for sentence to the Crown Court was lawful given the prior indication by the magistrates' court
- 2 Whether a legitimate expectation was created by the magistrates' indication
- 3 Whether the original decision of the magistrates was rational and lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The original magistrates' bench was entitled to retain jurisdiction and give the indication it did, and the claimant had a legitimate expectation that should be upheld. The district judge's decision to commit for sentence to the Crown Court was therefore quashed.
Court Disposition
Claim for judicial review allowed; district judge's decision to commit for sentence to the Crown Court quashed.
Orders
- District judge's decision to commit for sentence to the Crown Court quashed.
- Costs assessed at £3,500 plus VAT to be paid out of Central Funds under section 16 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment