Brennon, R (on the application of) v Bromsgrove District Council [2003] EWHC 752 (Admin) (17 March 2003)

Brennon, R (on the application of) v Bromsgrove District Council [2003] EWHC 752 (Admin) (17 March 2003)

The council complied with all statutory and regulatory requirements in making and confirming the tree preservation order; no procedural defect or prejudice was established; the reasons given were adequate; the identification of trees was sufficient; the change in approach was justified; and the statutory scheme is compliant with the European Convention on Human Rights. The claim is dismissed.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 752 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Brennon; Defendant: Bromsgrove District Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Final Judgment in the High Court, Administrative Court
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Tree Preservation Orders, Procedural Compliance, Judicial Review, European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR
Administrative Law Planning Law Human Rights Tree Preservation Orders Procedural Compliance Judicial Review European Convention on Human Rights Article 6 ECHR +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brennon

Claimant

Bromsgrove District Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Final Judgment in the High Court, Administrative Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the confirmation of the tree preservation order complied with statutory and regulatory requirements
  2. 2 Whether the council failed to serve required documents after confirmation
  3. 3 Whether the council failed to endorse the order as required

Ratio Decidendi

The council complied with all statutory and regulatory requirements in making and confirming the tree preservation order; no procedural defect or prejudice was established; the reasons given were adequate; the identification of trees was sufficient; the change in approach was justified; and the statutory scheme is compliant with the European Convention on Human Rights. The claim is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant to pay defendant's costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed