BPC Hotels Ltd v Brooke North (A Firm) [2014] EWHC 2367 (TCC) (06 June 2014)
The court found that it cannot be sufficiently confident at this stage that the claimants will be unable to prove their case on causation; summary judgment and strike out applications are dismissed except for Mrs Chandra's claim for the second guarantee, which is struck out by consent.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 2367 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: BPC Hotels Limited; Defendant: Brooke North (A Firm); Defendant: Brooke North LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application and Strike Out / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Defendants' applications for summary judgment and strike out dismissed except for Mrs Chandra's claim for the second guarantee, which is struck out by consent.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Reflective Loss, Personal Guarantees, Causation, Directors' Losses, Step in Provisions, Receivership
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BPC Hotels Limited
Claimant
Brooke North (A Firm)
Defendant
Brooke North LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application and Strike Out / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether BPC's claim has a real prospect of success on causation grounds
- 2 Whether Mrs Chandra can claim for losses relating to the second personal guarantee
- 3 Whether claims for directors' earnings and pension contributions contravene reflective loss rules
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that it cannot be sufficiently confident at this stage that the claimants will be unable to prove their case on causation; summary judgment and strike out applications are dismissed except for Mrs Chandra's claim for the second guarantee, which is struck out by consent.
Court Disposition
Defendants' applications for summary judgment and strike out dismissed except for Mrs Chandra's claim for the second guarantee, which is struck out by consent.
Orders
- Claimants granted permission to serve and rely on amended schedule of loss.
- Defendants ordered to pay £600 to claimants for travel and photocopying expenses within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment