BRP v R
Even accepting the appellant’s account of forced labour and threats, the prosecution would probably have been able to prove that a reasonable person in his situation would have had a realistic alternative to participating in the offence; thus, a s. 45 defence would probably have failed and the conviction is not unsafe.
- Parties
- Appellant: BRP; Respondent: REX
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Following Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Section 45 Modern Slavery Act Defence, Guilty Plea Vitiation, Forced Labour, Compulsion, Reasonable Alternatives, Trafficking Victim Status, Fresh Evidence on Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BRP
Appellant
REX
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Following Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was deprived of a good defence under s. 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 due to lack of advice
- 2 Whether the conviction is unsafe in light of fresh evidence of trafficking and forced labour
- 3 Whether a reasonable person in the appellant’s situation would have had a realistic alternative to committing the offence
Ratio Decidendi
Even accepting the appellant’s account of forced labour and threats, the prosecution would probably have been able to prove that a reasonable person in his situation would have had a realistic alternative to participating in the offence; thus, a s. 45 defence would probably have failed and the conviction is not unsafe.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Extension of time granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment