Ashworth v Newnote Ltd. [2007] EWCA Civ 253 (07 March 2007)
Permission for a second appeal was granted because the judge's summary determination of breach of fiduciary duty and exclusion of cross-claims raised a compelling reason for appellate review, and the applicant had a real prospect of success on appeal.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 253
- Parties
- Appellant: Bryce Ashworth; Respondent: Newnote Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted; stay of bankruptcy proceedings and costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Bankruptcy, Cross Claim, Summary Dismissal, Fiduciary Duties, Costs, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bryce Ashworth
Appellant
Newnote Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to set aside the statutory demand in full based on the existence of a genuine cross-claim or set-off
- 2 Whether the judge was correct to summarily determine issues of breach of fiduciary duty and summary dismissal
- 3 Whether the procedural posture justified a second appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Permission for a second appeal was granted because the judge's summary determination of breach of fiduciary duty and exclusion of cross-claims raised a compelling reason for appellate review, and the applicant had a real prospect of success on appeal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted; stay of bankruptcy proceedings and costs ordered.
Orders
- Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal granted.
- Stay of payment of £11,462 on account of costs pending appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment