BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and others
English law recognises a rule (the rule in West Mercia) that, when a company is insolvent or bordering on insolvency, directors' fiduciary duty to act in the interests of the company requires them to consider the interests of creditors as a whole. This rule is preserved by section 172(3) of the Companies Act 2006. However, the duty does not arise merely because there is a real and not remote risk of insolvency; it arises only when insolvency is imminent, probable, or unavoidable. In the present case, the company was solvent and not on the verge of insolvency at the time of the dividend, so the duty was not engaged and the appeal fails.
- Parties
- Appellant: BTI 2014 LLC; Respondent: Sequana SA; Respondent: Antoine Courteault; Respondent: Pierre Martinet; Respondent: Clive Mountford; Respondent: Martin Newell; Respondent: Selarl C Basse
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Duties, Fiduciary Duty, Creditors' Interests, Insolvency, Shareholder Primacy, Dividends, Wrongful Trading
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BTI 2014 LLC
Appellant
Sequana SA
Respondent
Antoine Courteault
Respondent
Pierre Martinet
Respondent
Clive Mountford
Respondent
Martin Newell
Respondent
Selarl C Basse
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does English law recognise a rule requiring directors to consider or act in the interests of creditors when a company is insolvent or nearing insolvency?
- 2 When does such a duty arise and what is its content?
- 3 Can the duty apply to otherwise lawful dividends?
Ratio Decidendi
English law recognises a rule (the rule in West Mercia) that, when a company is insolvent or bordering on insolvency, directors' fiduciary duty to act in the interests of the company requires them to consider the interests of creditors as a whole. This rule is preserved by section 172(3) of the Companies Act 2006. However, the duty does not arise merely because there is a real and not remote risk of insolvency; it arises only when insolvency is imminent, probable, or unavoidable. In the present case, the company was solvent and not on the verge of insolvency at the time of the dividend, so the duty was not engaged and the appeal fails.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment