Westshield Civil Engineering Ltd & Anor v Buckingham Group Contracting Ltd [2013] EWHC 1825 (TCC) (28 June 2013)

Westshield Civil Engineering Ltd & Anor v Buckingham Group Contracting Ltd [2013] EWHC 1825 (TCC) (28 June 2013)

The adjudicator's decision is not final and binding because Buckingham commenced court proceedings within 28 days of the decision, as required by the contract and CPR. However, the decision is binding pro tem and enforceable, and there are no grounds for a stay of execution as the defendant was aware of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] EWHC 1825 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: Westshield Civil Engineering Limited; Claimant: Westshield Limited; Defendant: Buckingham Group Contracting Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision (construction Contract) / Judgment on Enforcement Application
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant (Westshield Civil Engineering Limited) for the sum of £147,164.66; no stay of execution; no declaration of final binding effect of the adjudicator's decision.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Stay of Execution, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Commencement of Proceedings, Approbation and Reprobation
Construction Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Stay of Execution Jurisdiction of Adjudicator Commencement of Proceedings Approbation and Reprobation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Westshield Civil Engineering Limited

Claimant

Westshield Limited

Claimant

Buckingham Group Contracting Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision (construction Contract) / Judgment on Enforcement Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision is enforceable given the commencement of court proceedings by the defendant
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution should be granted due to the claimant's financial position
  3. 3 Whether the defendant is estopped from denying the identity of the subcontractor

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator's decision is not final and binding because Buckingham commenced court proceedings within 28 days of the decision, as required by the contract and CPR. However, the decision is binding pro tem and enforceable, and there are no grounds for a stay of execution as the defendant was aware of the claimant's financial position at the time of contracting and has not demonstrated a real risk of injustice.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant (Westshield Civil Engineering Limited) for the sum of £147,164.66; no stay of execution; no declaration of final binding effect of the adjudicator's decision.

Orders

  • Buckingham Group Contracting Limited to pay Westshield Civil Engineering Limited £147,164.66 (plus VAT if registered)
  • No stay of execution granted