Buckinghamshire Council v Mother & Ors

Buckinghamshire Council v Mother & Ors

Threshold for public law intervention is met due to Mother's inability to meet C's health needs, psychiatric diagnosis, non-compliance with treatment, and emotional harm caused by denial of relationship with Father. Placement with Father, supported by Supervision Order, best meets C's welfare needs. Non-Molestation,...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Buckinghamshire Council; First Respondent: Mother; Second Respondent: Father; Third Respondent: C (The Child)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Care and Supervision Proceedings / Final Judgment
Outcome
Child Arrangements Order for C to live with Father; Supervision Order for 12 months; Non-Molestation Order against Mother for 12 months; Section 91(14) Order against Mother for 3 years; Prohibited Steps and Specific Issue Orders granted; Special Guardianship application by Maternal Grandparents refused.
Legal Topics
Care Orders, Supervision Orders, Child Arrangements, Non Molestation Orders, Section 91(14) Orders, Prohibited Steps Orders, Specific Issue Orders, Parental Responsibility, Domestic Abuse, Mental Health, Special Guardianship
Family Law Child Protection Public Law Care Orders Supervision Orders Child Arrangements Non Molestation Orders Section 91(14) Orders +6 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Buckinghamshire Council

Applicant

Mother

First Respondent

Father

Second Respondent

C (The Child)

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Care and Supervision Proceedings / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether threshold for public law order under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 is met
  2. 2 Whether placement with Father is in C's welfare interest
  3. 3 Whether Supervision Order is necessary and proportionate

Ratio Decidendi

Threshold for public law intervention is met due to Mother's inability to meet C's health needs, psychiatric diagnosis, non-compliance with treatment, and emotional harm caused by denial of relationship with Father. Placement with Father, supported by Supervision Order, best meets C's welfare needs. Non-Molestation, Prohibited Steps, Specific Issue, and Section 91(14) Orders are necessary and proportionate to protect C and ensure stability.

Court Disposition

Child Arrangements Order for C to live with Father; Supervision Order for 12 months; Non-Molestation Order against Mother for 12 months; Section 91(14) Order against Mother for 3 years; Prohibited Steps and Specific Issue Orders granted; Special Guardianship application by Maternal Grandparents refused.

Orders

  • Child Arrangements Order: C to live with Father; supervised contact with Mother as recommended by Local Authority during Supervision Order.
  • Supervision Order for 12 months to Buckinghamshire Council.