L (An Infant), R (On the Application Of) v Buckinghamshire County Council

L (An Infant), R (On the Application Of) v Buckinghamshire County Council

The Council's consultation process was fair, took place at a formative stage, provided sufficient information, and allowed meaningful participation; the Council properly considered and complied with its sufficiency duty, statutory guidance, and equality duties; the decision to close children's centres and...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: THE QUEEN (on the application of L, an infant) by his mother and litigation friend, X; Defendant: BUCKINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Consultation Requirements, Children's Centres Provision, Statutory Duties of Local Authorities, Public Sector Equality Duty, Sufficiency Duty Under Childcare Act, Early Help Strategy, Closure of Public Facilities
Administrative Law Public Law Local Government Law Child Welfare Law Equality Law Consultation Requirements Children's Centres Provision Statutory Duties of Local Authorities +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE QUEEN (on the application of L, an infant) by his mother and litigation friend, X

Claimant

BUCKINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the consultation process regarding closure of children's centres was lawful and fair
  2. 2 Whether the Council breached its sufficiency duty under section 5A of the Childcare Act 2006
  3. 3 Whether the Council breached duties under sections 1 and 3 of the Childcare Act 2006 and section 11 of the Children Act 2004

Ratio Decidendi

The Council's consultation process was fair, took place at a formative stage, provided sufficient information, and allowed meaningful participation; the Council properly considered and complied with its sufficiency duty, statutory guidance, and equality duties; the decision to close children's centres and restructure services was lawful and rational.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim for judicial review dismissed