Oddy, R (on the application of) v Bugbugs Ltd. [2003] EWHC 2865 (Admin) (12 November 2003)
Pedicabs, as vehicles plying for hire and charging separate fares, fall within the statutory definition of 'stage carriage' under section 4 of the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 and are not hackney carriages; the reasoning in ex parte Lane does not apply due to different statutory language. The drivers' conduct did not amount to 'soliciting' under section 167 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, as there was no active invitation. The District Judge was entitled to award costs against the prosecutor due to the unnecessary prosecution of issues already determined in previous proceedings.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 2865 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert David Oddy; Defendant: Bugbugs Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal (administrative Court) / Appeal From Magistrates' Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Hackney Carriage and Stage Carriage, Licensing of Pedicabs, Soliciting for Hire, Award of Costs in Criminal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert David Oddy
Claimant
Bugbugs Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal (administrative Court) / Appeal From Magistrates' Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pedicabs are 'stage carriages' or 'hackney carriages' under the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869
- 2 Whether the principles in R v Cambridge City Council ex parte Lane apply to the 1869 Act
- 3 Whether the drivers were 'soliciting' within the meaning of section 167 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
Ratio Decidendi
Pedicabs, as vehicles plying for hire and charging separate fares, fall within the statutory definition of 'stage carriage' under section 4 of the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 and are not hackney carriages; the reasoning in ex parte Lane does not apply due to different statutory language. The drivers' conduct did not amount to 'soliciting' under section 167 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, as there was no active invitation. The District Judge was entitled to award costs against the prosecutor due to the unnecessary prosecution of issues already determined in previous proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- District Judge's decision affirmed
- Costs to be paid by the appellant to all respondents, subject to assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment