Lomas & Ors v Burlington Loan Management Ltd & Ors
For the ISDA Master Agreement issues, the proceedings were more akin to a necessary application for directions in the interests of the general body of creditors, not adversarial litigation, and costs of SCG and GSI should be paid out of the LBIE administration estate, with SCG's costs limited to one firm of solicitors. For the GMA issues, the proceedings were adversarial commercial litigation brought by SCG for its own benefit, and the usual rule applies: SCG should pay Wentworth's costs.
- Parties
- Applicants: Anthony Victor Lomas, Stevens Anthony Pearson, Paul David Copley, Russell Downs, Julian Guy Parr (The Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration)); Respondent: Burlington Loan Management Limited; Respondent: CVI GVF (Lux) Master S. A. R. L; Respondent: Hutchinson Investors, LLC; Respondent: Wentworth Sons Sub-Debt S. A. R. L; Respondent: York Global Finance BDH, LLC; Respondent: Goldman Sachs International
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application (costs Determination) / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Costs of SCG and GSI on ISDA Master Agreement issues to be paid out of the LBIE administration estate (SCG costs limited to one firm of solicitors); SCG to pay Wentworth's costs on GMA issues.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Statutory Interest, Administration of Insolvent Estates, Interpretation of Pre Administration Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Victor Lomas, Stevens Anthony Pearson, Paul David Copley, Russell Downs, Julian Guy Parr (The Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration))
Applicants
Burlington Loan Management Limited
Respondent
CVI GVF (Lux) Master S. A. R. L
Respondent
Hutchinson Investors, LLC
Respondent
Wentworth Sons Sub-Debt S. A. R. L
Respondent
York Global Finance BDH, LLC
Respondent
Goldman Sachs International
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application (costs Determination) / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs of the Senior Creditor Group (SCG) and Goldman Sachs International (GSI) should be paid out of the LBIE administration estate or follow the event in accordance with the usual rule for adversarial litigation
- 2 Whether the costs relating to German Master Agreement (GMA) issues should be treated differently from those relating to ISDA Master Agreement issues
Ratio Decidendi
For the ISDA Master Agreement issues, the proceedings were more akin to a necessary application for directions in the interests of the general body of creditors, not adversarial litigation, and costs of SCG and GSI should be paid out of the LBIE administration estate, with SCG's costs limited to one firm of solicitors. For the GMA issues, the proceedings were adversarial commercial litigation brought by SCG for its own benefit, and the usual rule applies: SCG should pay Wentworth's costs.
Court Disposition
Costs of SCG and GSI on ISDA Master Agreement issues to be paid out of the LBIE administration estate (SCG costs limited to one firm of solicitors); SCG to pay Wentworth's costs on GMA issues.
Orders
- SCG and GSI's costs on ISDA Master Agreement issues to be paid as an expense of the administration of LBIE, with SCG's costs limited to those as if only one firm of solicitors was retained.
- SCG to pay Wentworth's costs on the GMA issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment