Butler & Anor v Thompson

Butler & Anor v Thompson

The Court held that, on the balance of probabilities, the claimant's post-accident condition was caused by the accident and constituted brain damage, based on the evidence of a profound change in her wellbeing not explained by her prior history or a mild whiplash injury. The trial judge was entitled to prefer Dr Harvey's evidence despite criticisms. The misreading of the SPECT scan did not break the chain of causation. The claimant's residual earning capacity was higher than her current earnings, and the award should be recalculated accordingly.

Parties
Appellant: Butler & Another; Respondent: Thompson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Legal Topics
Damages, Causation, Mitigation of Loss, Expert Evidence
Tort Law Personal Injury Damages Causation Mitigation of Loss Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Butler & Another

Appellant

Thompson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's continuing disabilities were caused by organic brain damage from the accident
  2. 2 Whether the misreading of the SPECT scan broke the chain of causation
  3. 3 Whether the claimant's neck pain was attributable to the accident

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that, on the balance of probabilities, the claimant's post-accident condition was caused by the accident and constituted brain damage, based on the evidence of a profound change in her wellbeing not explained by her prior history or a mild whiplash injury. The trial judge was entitled to prefer Dr Harvey's evidence despite criticisms. The misreading of the SPECT scan did not break the chain of causation. The claimant's residual earning capacity was higher than her current earnings, and the award should be recalculated accordingly.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part

Orders

  • Award of damages to be recalculated based on a residual earning capacity of £3,500 per year
  • Appeal otherwise dismissed